So, yes the assassination of a dictator can also be justified i, for one, believe that if the majority of people is being suppressed and abused in a regime run by 1 person's rules, then go for it kill the bastard. The name julius caesar summons imagery of an assassination that was so momentous that it has been immortalised by william shakespeare however, caesar was more than the victim of a conspiratorial group he was a politician, military commander and dictator this was a key moment in the history of . Can the assassination of a dictator be justified assassination can be defined as the targeted killing of an individual for political reasons in peacetime it can be undertaken by individual citizens, or by the agents of another state, but in either case it takes place without any legal process.
The topic for this debate is the assassination of a dictator is a justified act” parallex will be arguing the pro position and begin the debate. Most would argue that the assassination of a dictator is a good, justifiable thing to do, and i find myself agreeing yet, despite dictators’ unrighteous actions, there are some who still argue against getting rid of oppressive leaders. If a dictator or other leader is known to be a credible threat to his state then i'd say yes, even if it was illegal then assassination would be justified if it prevented a greater evil from being comitted.
No way can you justified like for example you could see into the future and saw that a somebody you work with or go to school would turn out to be a evil dictator would you be able to kill them and would it be justified if the did nothing i think what the us has done is wrong, but they caused the problem did you know that the us govenerment in the cold war trained osama bin laden to fight . Voice your opinion argue whether you think that the assassination of a dictator can be justified see what other people are saying. Well it depends on his conduct , being a dictator is not a crime on its own but the abuse of power is the problem there were some good dictators even in bible days. In such cases, assassination is certainly justifiable tyrants directly jeopardizing societal welfare can be assassinated if a tyrant directly contravenes societal welfare, it can be justified to assassinate him or her.
Assassination of a dictator is a duty, obligation, and notion of democracy of america killing someone who might kill millions of people is a duty that all people have this duty is saving other people's lives at the cost of an awful person is justifiable. Assassination is morally justified if and only if all of the following conditions are met: the tyrant has systematically transgressed against the common good caesar wielded power in a few respects reminiscent of tyranny: he appointed numerous public officials elections were either skirted or pro forma and he controlled political power in rome. The alternatives to assassination would all leave a dictator in power for many years in that time not only will many more people suffer under a repressive system, but the policies pursued by an out-of-touch and unrepresentative regime are likely to do serious (if unintentional) harm to the whole nation and its economy, making eventual .
Me and a friend the other day were discussing assassinations throughout history, and as we flowed through the discussion i brought up dictators, and thus i tho. The assassination of julius caesar was the result of a conspiracy by many roman senators led by gaius cassius caesar was the dictator of the roman republic, . I would have to say that in realistic situations, it is almost impossible for the assassination of a dictator to be adequately justified the problem is that we have to weigh two possibilities:. The assassination of a dictator is never a surgical process you cannot remove a dictator and expect that a flowering democracy will bloom the next minute – it is a “rumsfeld-ian” philosophy clearly shown to fail in iraq.
The ethics of assassination force is justified “in order to prevent the attack or to deter further attacks” in a dictatorship, . In my opinion, political assassination is almost never justified if that individual derives his mandate from popular support it is an act of censorship, extrajudicial killing (murder), and suppression of a self-determination through freedom to determine political status, a fundamental right . Most would argue that the assassination of a dictator is a good, justifiable thing to do, and i find myself agreeing yet, despite dictators' unrighteous actions, there are some who still argue against getting rid of oppressive leaders. Description submitted by: grant lawrence b garcia submitted to: mrs mallari can the assassination of a cruel dictator be justified assassination is the act of murdering a political.
Can the assassination of a dictator be justified i want at least 3 solid reasons please. Do you consider the assassination of julius caesar a justifiable act was it a heroic killing of a tyrant that wanted to be king, or the craven murder of a reformer that threatened the old oligarchy.
Motion: thbt the assassination of a dictator for the purpose of regime change is justifiable definition dictator : a person exercising absolute power, especially a ruler who has absolute, unrestricted control in a government without hereditary succession. Can the assassination of a dictator be justified i assume this probably has something to do with gaddafi well there is a lot of controversy around that, but in my opinion yes. The assassination of a dictator can/cannot be justified assisted suicide should/should not be legalised beauty contests are/are not harmful.